4. No Product Placements, sponsorships, point-of purchase marketing, or depictions in entertainment venues. Why is this needed? The FCC agreed, granting time for one free counter ad for every four tobacco ads. The anti-smoking ads were so effective that the tobacco industry voluntarily offered to stop advertising on television if it was granted immunity from anti-trust lawsuits and in exchange for loosening requirements for package warning labels. The FCC abolished the fairness doctrine in 1987. The tobacco industry found other ways to promote its products on television indirectly through sponsorships of racing cars, placement of billboard sized ads in sports stadiums whose games are televised, and other means. The alcohol industry advertises on television without restraint. Product Placements Both tobacco and alcohol target youth through alternate methods of advertising and marketing as well:
A document uncovered in tobacco trials in the 1990s revealed how Phillip Morris provided products for use in movies as youth-oriented as The Muppet Movie and Who Framed Roger Rabbit. To prevent this from happening again, the Master Tobacco Settlement Agreement of 1998:
Sponsorships
To reduce the impact on youth of tobacco sponsorships, the tobacco settlement:
Point-of-Purchase Marketing
Depictions in Entertainment Media The American Academy of Pediatrics calls for greatly reducing the exposure of young children to depictions of drinking and smoking in television programs and movies. Research shows this exposure is a key factor in persuading teenagers to start smoking, start drinking, and to binge drink. (5)
Product placements, sponsorships, point-of-purchase advertising, and depictions in TV and movie content have a significant impact in influencing children and teenagers to start using addictive drugs. This provision will prevent a commercial marijuana industry from engaging in any of these activities. ____________________ References 1. Personal communication with Paul Bloom, PhD, Faculty Director, Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. 2. The Master Tobacco Settlement Agreement of 1998. 3. Tworek C, Yamaguchi R, Kloska DD, Emery S, Barker DC, Giovino GA, O’Malley PM, Chaloupka FJ. “State-level tobacco control policies and youth smoking cessation measures.” Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):136-44. 4. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2004 and 2005 (2007), Tables 2-2C. Washington DC. 5. Council on Communications and Media. “Policy statement—children, adolescents, substance abuse, and the media.” American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2010;126(4):791-799. 6. Dalton MA, Adachi-Meija AM, Longacre MR et al. “Parental rules and monitoring of children’s movie viewing associated with children’s risk for smoking and drinking.” Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):1932–1942. 7. Sargent JD, Beach ML, Adachi-Mejia AM, et al. “Exposure to movie smoking: its relation to smoking initiation among US adolescents.” Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):1183–1191. 8. Glantz SA, Titus K, Mitchell S, Polansky J, Kaufmann RB. “Smoking in top-grossing movies—United States, 1991–2009.” MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(32):1014 –1017. 9. Gruber EL, Thau HM, Hill DL, Fisher DA, Grube JW. “Alcohol, tobacco and illicit substances in music videos: a content analysis of prevalence and genre.” J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(1):81– 83. 10. Sargent JD, Wills TA, Stoolmiller M, Gibson J, Gibbons FX. “Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking.” J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67(1):54–65. 11. Mo Bahk C. “Perceived realism and role attractiveness in movie portrayals of alcohol drinking.” Am J Health Behav. 2001; 25(5):433– 446. |
Copyright 2011 by National Families in Action. All rights reserved. Last updated: